This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Goldson, B. Articles by Jamieson, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Youth Crime, the ‘Parenting Deficit’ and State Intervention: A Contextual Critique

Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Studies, The University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, b.goldson{at}liv.ac.uk

Janet Jamieson

On 1 June 2000 a new court order was implemented in England and Wales. The Parenting Order provided for the extension of state intervention (primarily through youth justice agencies) into ‘family life’. We have recently completed research with regard to youth justice parenting initiatives, and during the course of our research, our interest in, and concern with, the broader question of ‘parenting’, ‘parental responsibility’ and the ‘parenting deficit’ consolidated. This article sets out our principal concerns by locating the new statutory powers within their wider context. By tracing their historical antecedents, theoretical foundations and policy expressions we aim to critique the latest developments in state intervention. Similarly, by analysing the material circumstances of the parents who are targeted by such intervention, and reviewing the means by which children, young people and parents conceive such intervention, we argue that the new powers essentially comprise an extension of punitiveness underpinned by stigmatising and pathologising constructions of working class families.

Youth Justice, Vol. 2, No. 2, 82-99 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/147322540200200203


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Parr Family Intervention Projects: A Site of Social Work Practice Br. J. Soc. Work, April 29, 2008; (2008) bcn057v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Broadhurst, C. Mason, and C. Grover Sure Start and the `re-authorization' of Section 47 child protection practices Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2007; 27(4): 443 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hollingsworth Responsibility and Rights: Children and Their Parents in the Youth Justice System Int J Law Policy Family, August 1, 2007; 21(2): 190 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Walters and R. Woodward Punishing 'Poor Parents': 'Respect', 'Responsibility' and Parenting Orders in Scotland Youth Justice, April 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Muncie Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2006; 26(4): 770 - 793. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. K. M. Tisdall Antisocial behaviour legislation meets children's services: challenging perspectives on children, parents and the state Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2006; 26(1): 101 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Jamieson New Labour, Youth Justice and the Question of 'Respect' Youth Justice, December 1, 2005; 5(3): 180 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Phoenix Rethinking Youth Prostitution: National Provision at the Margins of Child Protection and Youth Justice Youth Justice, December 1, 2003; 3(3): 152 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Goldson Editorial Youth Justice, August 1, 2003; 3(2): 71 - 73. [PDF]